The figures of every religious culture are necessarily secularized and recede. They can keep themselves alive only as ideas, symbols, and ghosts, and finally comic figures. And in the end even in this form they sink into oblivion. No sentence is more dangerous or revolutionary than that God is One and there is no other like Him…There is no more room now for what the recent past [referring to the 19th century] called toleration. Beside God there are only His creatures or false gods, and beside faith in Him there are religions only as religions of superstition, error and finally irreligion.

Karl Barth, Church Dogmatics. [II, I, p443f]

It was no mere fabrication when the Early Church was accused by the world around it of atheism, and it would have been wiser for its apologists not to have defended themselves so keenly against this charge. There is a real basis for this feeling, current to this day, that every genuine proclamation of the Christian faith is a force disturbing to, even destructive of, the advance of religion, its life and richness and peace. It is bound to be so.

Karl Barth, Church Dogmatics. [II, I, p443f]

Jesus is saying that both the irreligious and the religious are spiritually lost, both life-paths are dead ends, and that every thought the human race has had about how to connect to God has been wrong.

Tim Keller, The Prodigal God (p11)

Christianity’s basic message differs at root with the assumptions of traditional religion. The founders of every other major religion essentially came as teachers, not as saviors. They came to say: “Do this and you will find the divine.” But Jesus came essentially as a savior rather than a teacher (though he was that as well). Jesus says: “I am the divine come to you, to do what you could not do for yourselves.” The Christian message is that we are saved not by our record, but by Christ’s record. So Christianity is not religion or irreligion. It is something else altogether.

Tim Keller, The Reason for God (p185)

Atheistic philosopher Sam Harris on “Why we should ditch religion” and, surprisingly, along the way explains why Islam and Christianity are incompatible and why it doesn’t work to say “what works for you is good for you and what works for me is good for me”. Though I disagree w/ his fundamental premise (that religion is the fundamental problem of the universe, sin is) but I agree with much of what he says.

(Note: Facebook users select “View Original Post”.)